Key Takeaways 

  • The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) designated six individuals and entities tied to Cartel del Noreste (CDN)—one of Mexico’s most violent drug trafficking organizations—including two CDN-affiliated casinos used for money laundering and drug operations near the U.S.-Mexico border. 
  • OFAC’s actions are the latest examples of a broader national security strategy to use sanctions, AML authorities, criminal prosecutions, and other tools to counter cartels on the U.S.-Mexico border. These efforts have targeted in particular non-traditional financial institutions such as casinos, public-facing professionals, and disinformation actors. 
  • The State Department designated CDN as a foreign terrorist organization (FTO) on February 20, 2026, and today’s designations were issued under both Executive Order 14059 (narcotics trafficking) and Executive Order 13224 (terrorism), underscoring the U.S. government’s treatment of major cartels as hybrid criminal-terrorist threats.
Continue Reading OFAC Sanctions Cartel-Linked Casinos and Financial Enablers on the Southern Border 

On Jan. 14, New York state Sen. Zellnor Myrie proposed legislation in the New York State Senate that would amend New York law to make it a criminal offense to operate a virtual currency business in the state without the proper license.

By introducing the possibility of criminal penalties, S.B. 8901 — the Cryptocurrency Regulation Yields Protections, Trust and Oversight, or CRYPTO, Act — would mark a significant regulatory shift in how New York regulates virtual currency businesses.

For virtual currency businesses operating in New York and their counsel, the CRYPTO Act presents significant implications.

Crowell’s Carlton Greene, Anand Sithian, and Allison Fleming recently published an article in Law360 covering these developments, and proactive steps that market participants may wish to consider taking.

Click here to read the full article.

Overview

On March 12, 2026, the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) took formal steps toward establishing additional regulations for prediction markets. The agency issued an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) soliciting public input on potential new rules, and separately, released staff guidance outlining its views on how existing rules apply to prediction market platforms currently in operation. These developments signal a significant shift in the regulatory landscape for an industry that has grown rapidly over the past year.

Continue Reading CFTC Takes Additional Steps Toward Prediction Market Regulation: What You Need to Know

What You Need To Know

  • The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) issued six new general licenses, and updated a seventh that allow for many activities related to: the export of Venezuelan oil and petrochemical products from Venezuela; the exploration, development, and production of oil, gas, and petrochemical products in Venezuela; the generation, transmission, storage, or distribution of electricity in Venezuela; the export to Venezuela of U.S.-origin diluents; negotiating for investment in the oil, gas, petrochemical, and electricity sectors in Venezuela; and the export of Venezuelan gold.
  • The new general licenses contain a number of significant conditions, including in GLs 46B and 51, a limitation to the activities of “established U.S. entities,” and in GLs 46B, 47, 48A, 50A, and 51, limits on counterparties and operators, a prohibition on the involvement of entities with specific relationships to China, Cuba, Iran, North Korea, and Russia, or of sanctioned vessels, and contractual requirements to use U.S. law and U.S. dispute resolution mechanisms.
  • This regulatory space is fast moving, with multiple changes occurring over a short time period, and any plan to rely on these general licenses and authorizations should include transaction-by-transaction assessment, along with monitoring by compliance and legal functions.
Continue Reading Eight Takeaways After Seven Weeks of OFAC’s Six — wait, Seven — New and Updated General Licenses for Venezuela

As more commercial tenants seek bankruptcy protection, the question of assuming or assigning their leases and what defaults need to be cured gets debated. Not all Circuits have decided these issues. The topic of non-monetary defaults seems to get the most attention.

In bankruptcy, assumption or rejection allows a debtor (tenant) to decide whether to keep or terminate unexpired, nonresidential real property leases to maximize business profitability. Assumption means the debtor continues the lease, curing all defaults. Rejection terminates the lease, allowing the debtor to walk away, with damages capped by statute.

Does a debtor/trustee have to cure a default relating to a “going dark” provision or cure other non-monetary defaults in a nonresidential real property lease to assume or assign (or to take other action with respect to) that lease under section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code?

Continue Reading You Don’t Have to Turn Back Time to Turn on the Lights

What You Need to Know

Key Takeaway #1: FinCEN will no longer require covered financial institutions to identify and verify beneficial owners of legal entity customers each time the customer opens a new account at the institution, but rather only in certain circumstances.

Key Takeaway #2: FinCEN will instead require certain financial institutions to identify and verify the identities of such beneficial owners: (1) when a legal entity customer first opens an account with a covered financial institution; (2) when the covered financial institution has knowledge of facts that would reasonably call into question the reliability of beneficial ownership information previously obtained about the legal entity customer; and (3) as needed based on a covered financial institution’s risk-based procedures for conducting ongoing customer due diligence. For (3), covered financial institutions may rely on the customer’s certification that its beneficial ownership information has not changed, unless there is reason to question this.

Key Takeaway #3: The exceptive relief is the latest instance of recent efforts by the Department of the Treasury to modernize and eliminate unnecessary burdens associated with BSA rules; covered financial institutions are likely to welcome the relief.

Continue Reading FinCEN Grants Exceptive Relief to Streamline Beneficial Ownership Verification Requirements for Financial Institutions

Key Takeaways:

  1. The Russian Federation, Bolivia and the British Virgin Islands (“BVI”) have been added to the EU list of third countries deemed high risk for AML/CTF purposes.
  2. The EU has removed Burkina Faso, Mali, Mozambique, Nigeria, South Africa, and Tanzania from this list.
  3. The EU’s position redefines the risk landscape for entities with exposure to Russian, Bolivian, and BVI organisations or individuals, and consequently increases commercial pressure on EU/Russian relationships with extensive global sanctions already imposed due to the ongoing Russia/Ukraine conflict.
Continue Reading EU Amendments to List of High-Risk AML/CTF Countries

The UK’s Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI) has launched a call for evidence concerning the “ownership and control” test within UK financial sanctions. The call for evidence, running until 11:59 p.m. on 13 April 2026, seeks stakeholder views on the challenges and implementation of the “control” limb, with particular focus on its hypothetical element.

Continue Reading UK Government Seeks Evidence on Ownership and Control in Financial Sanctions Regulations

On January 14, 2026, State Senator Zellnor Myrie proposed legislation in the New York State Senate that would amend New York law to make it a criminal offense to operate a virtual currency business in New York without the proper license. By introducing the possibility of criminal penalties, Senate Bill S. 8901, the Cryptocurrency Regulation Yields Protections, Trust, and Oversight Act (CRYPTO Act), would mark a significant regulatory shift in the state’s oversight of virtual currency businesses, given New York’s prominence in virtual currency regulation in the U.S.

Continue Reading Proposed NY Legislation May Mean Potential Criminal Charges for Unlicensed Crypto Firms

The financing of legal actions by third parties has grown exponentially since the early 2000s and is now common across many common law and civil law jurisdictions. It is still in its infancy in Qatar, but the Qatar International Centre for Conciliation and Arbitration (the “QICCA”) expressly recognised third party dispute funding in its 2024 rules update (the “QICCA Rules”).

This article seeks to provide a brief introduction to third party funding, and how it can make justice more accessible in a time when arbitration has become an expensive endeavour. While third party dispute funding may allow greater access to arbitration, it requires a careful balancing act between the interests of the claim’s stakeholders, and indeed those of the adverse party, with private equity investment demands.

Continue Reading Qatar Third-Party Dispute Funding: An Introduction